Feminine-ists

Some of you may or may not know that I have gotten tired of those few dozen loud male voices who verbally beat on women (including myself) day in and day out if we complain of verbal battery by this jerk or that jerk.

It really interferes with my work.

Upset that White men are routinely bashed in mainstream society, those loud few dozen pay us back with bad, unchivalrous behavior or make generalized statements that we feel are directed toward us.  In turn, some of us like men just a little less each time we are treated this way.    This is the way Jews like it, which makes me madder, infuriated.

To make a long story short,  I felt unappreciated, like there was no place for feisty women like me in the movement and said I was giving up AWF for a less time consuming, more moderate activist role. After all, my job is not to get along with a whole bunch of people, all with strong personalities and too many beefs to count.  Writing AWF for a large audience put my backside on the line, and brought massive criticism from my own folk.  I felt that society at large was hostile enough to our people and that I didn't have the thick skin necessary to fight with my own as well.  So I informed a few people that I was stepping away from writing for a while.

Then it was pointed out to me that if I gave up writing because of a few guys who hate women, the enemy would be smiling wide.  That stuck with me, and made me angrier.   To make matters worse, my decision lowered the morale of other activist women I know and they asked "Why should I continue then?"  I felt awfully dumb trying to explain why they should stick around, but that I am bailing out.

For them (and in defiance of the enemy), I keep writing, but only for women's web sites, and far less frequently than before.  If anyone wants to read my stuff, they must link to a site run by women.

The bottom line is this:  I (and we) must be in an environment where women's characteristics and virtues are considered a positive and necessary element to the struggle.

I have decided that for me, a new course of activism is called for.  My old stuff (4 years ago) was exciting, and reached fence sitters. It had a strong sense of indignation and appealed to our people's sense of fairness.  I was making a difference and I knew it.  People wrote to me and said I got them thinking about these issues.  However, the last few years, I have written for the sole benefit of racialists and have not received many letters from people who opened their eyes because of my writing.  I was preaching to the choir.  I am hereby going back to my old style, and perhaps I'll write a few things exclusively for racialist women.

Compassionate Racialism

I strongly believe the female approach to racial evangelism is better suited to people who think of themselves as kind and compassionate (a majority of the population).  These people would never consider racialism if the sole message was adrenaline fueled pure hatred.

I remember when I first got a computer and started surfing the newsgroups.  I saw a post from a racialist and thought it was very mean and offensive, it oozed with blind fury.  It turned me off to racialism and reinforced the message of our opposition that our ranks are filled with mean people who hate.  My awakening was the result of my own research due to the behavior of the enemy, followed by the efforts of two activists, one a woman.  Their strategy was to point out our victimization rather than appearing to victimize others.  They appealed to my sense of fairness, and made this former liberal see the light.

The so-called "feminine" approach works, despite the taboo of any and all things feminine.  Women are uniquely suited to the art of sizing people up and tailoring the message to appeal to almost anyone. This approach will not be used regularly unless we increase the numbers of females in the movement and more importantly, let them know they are wanted and welcome, in whatever capacity they wish.

Working Women

Now this may be controversial, but I must say it.  I have written articles strongly critical of feminism, but I blamed women and Jews for it, yet men left an opening for this type of movement by attaching utmost importance to masculine things and scorning feminine things.

Lets go back to before modern (Jewish) feminism:   Let us look at what in this society commanded respect and brought personal power. Money and those who earned it.  "I pay the bills, I make the decisions." You are "just" a housewife.  "As long as you live under my roof, you abide by my rules." Importance and prestige were attached to making money. Those who didn't make money had no power.

Hence, when women went to work in the factories during the war, they earned money and gained power.  Even without Jews or war, women working outside the home was inevitable because of the economy, new technology and importance attached to the materialistic "American dream." History has shown us that women's roles do indeed change when the economy does.

Don't get me wrong, I believe working women do bear some responsibility for our CURRENT predicament.  But it is unfair to blame us for the social changes that took place because of the war and new economy. Women simply adapted to the changes and did what was necessary to support their families.

Despite popular myth, White women did not stop having children because we started working.  Our birth rate was declining in the late 1900's, all around the world.  We were working only at home then and did not vote.  But the economy was slowly changing from agricultural to industrial and from rural to city life.  Fewer children were needed on the farm.   Hence we had fewer children.  The (male) creation of birth control did lower the birth rate more, and people utilized it because they wanted to live like civilized White people rather than the hordes of Mexicans swarming our borders.  Yet I have been called a "feminist" for defending birth control!  By men who have certainly utilized it themselves.

Feminist as a Dirty Word

I am not sure how "feminist" is defined in the movement. Outside, a feminist is a man-hater who thinks women should fight alongside men in hand to hand combat or that we should be paid for cleaning our own houses and cooking for our families.

My female associates and I, who are often called "feminists" do not fit this profile.   We are strong willed, opinionated, and we speak our minds.   Feminism did not make us this way,  feisty women have been around since the dawn of time.

Despite our fervent wish that we could afford to stay home and have babies, we are still called "feminists."   We are called "feminists" despite our belief  that women should not be firefighters, cops, army grunts,  football coaches or asphalt layers.  We are called "feminists" even if we agree that a man, provided he is honorable and treats his wife well, should be the head of the family.  We are "feminists" even though we fight modern feminism.

There is no clear definition of 'feminist' within our own ranks. It is used (misused, actually) as a battering ram to silence women with gripes, just as the word 'racist' is used to shut up lemming dissenters and the term "anti-Semite" to identify those Jews don't like.

We are on to this!  We, like men, are called all of these names and we know the function of the term.

We are not lemmings.  It does not silence us, it pisses us off.

I am not a feminist.  I am a FEMININE-IST.  I am sick of being called a feminist.  Don't you dare say it again.

ANGRY WHITE FEMALE