Children: Quality vs. Quantity
There is much talk in White nationalist circles that White women should
be in a constant state of pregnancy. Very simplistic, and easier
said than done. Don't get me wrong, we need more babies, but few pro-White
women and families are in a position where they could support several children
and raise them correctly, away from public schools. That is why I
resent it when married White nationalists on good financial footing lecture,
scold and stand in judgment of others who may not be in a position to support
(medical insurance too) a busload of children. I believe at this
time, the quality of our race needs improving, more so than the quantity.
Make no mistake, White women of child-bearing age or younger are 2% of
the world's population and we must replace ourselves. However, I
do not believe our race set out to render themselves extinct by lowering
their birth rate. We set out to better ourselves and give our (fewer)
children a better quality of life. In a White society, this is ideal.
The "Truth at Last" newspaper ran an article from the late 1800's that
indicated Whites were declining in number all over the world. At
that time, the Jews and Judeo-feminists had not yet begun to weave their
web. There were only a handful of self-loathing Whites and birth
control was not yet invented. At that time, there was a massive move
to the cities and away from farms. Fewer women were dying in childbirth,
thanks to a lower birthrate. And the child mortality rate was decreasing,
so that more children were surviving into adulthood. Fewer children
were needed to tend farms because of the move toward the cities and improved
technology. Our people were filled with hope for the future.
They carved a place out for themselves in the wilderness and were embarking
on an age which would bring about huge advances in industry and technology.
With that change (and well before) came a lower birth rate, and with greater
prosperity came more rights for women as well.
Yet some still use the ill-informed explanation that we started having
fewer children because women started working, and the ready-made instant
culprit is 1960's feminism. I have news for them: women have
always worked their asses off except for one brief period in American history.
This period, the suburban 30's, 40's and 50's, allowed women, for the first
time, a chance to sit around and eat bon bons after the kids went to school.
I like that idea myself, but it is not representative of our history as
a race, not by ANY means. Yet many folks, due to Jewish promoted
stereotypes, believe it was always that way. For others, it was the
generation
they grew up in.
I grew up with a stay at home mom who despite being a straight A student,
skipped college to marry, as her mother did. Her dreams were shattered
when my alcoholic father bailed permanently when I was a toddler and my
brother was 7. Then an abusive step dad took the helm, and my mother
endured physical abuse because she had no education or means to support
the kids. She was too weak to leave. We children endured mental
abuse because of my fathers' decision to leave and my mothers' pathetic
display of weakness. I learned to resent weak women and be wary of
men who said "submit" and "boss" regularly through that experience.
My point is not to whine, but that we all have different frames of reference,
and mine is no more a one size fits all than the 50's mold some want to
put young women into. We are to some extent a product of our environment,
and sometimes when women or men do not fit into that "mold," it is not
necessarily because of "feminism." Often it is their own experience.
I am 33 and my parents' generation was the first to adopt Judeo-feminism
and unchivalry. Just imagine what kind of home lives the children of today
have.
I got off subject there, but I wanted to provide an example of why some
women do not believe unquestioned obedience and dependence espoused by
older movement members is the way to go. We are molded in large part
by the actions of the men around us, especially if the women are weak and
incapable. It is my firm belief that every women should have a way
to support herself, because of my personal experiences, and nothing will
change that. If her husband dies or is dishonorable, she is
responsible for those kids. Those kids, if traumatized, will lash
out at society with a vengeance and then we are all affected by it.
And that is what we are seeing today with our youth. Most prison
inmates were raised by single mothers. Yet the mothers who stayed
there and raised the kids, not the fathers, are condemned for this social
problem. We must look at both parents. My point is that White
people, not just the women, are not as honorable as they used to be.
If mine was the first really dysfunctional generation, then today's children
are really screwed up. In this kind of environment, it is quite a
stretch to expect women to be totally dependent with so much uncertainty.
JUDEO-CULTURALISM
Now, before we decide to emulate Mexican family life and birth rates,
we must think about improving the quality of our race and environment.
Just as so many of our children died from natural causes in centuries past,
we will lose still more to unnatural causes (Judeo-culturalism) no matter
how many we have. It is the diseased environment they are brought
up in which is the real problem. Just as ending abortion in America
would decrease our share of the population, so might having 10 kids in
an environment where race-mixing is held up as a moral imperative.
Case in point: I picked up my local free paper today in this one
horse town I live in. In the past, I mentioned that the only race
mixing I see around here are White men with Asians or Mexicans. Apparently,
the local anti-Palestinian church took note of that. Staring at me
from the front of this paper was an interracial couple from down in the
valley who were just "unanimously" selected to become the youth pastors.
They will be ministering to all of the local children who attend the local
Judeo-conservative church. The church couldn't pick a local
couple, they had to import a.. (gasp) Negro/Mestizo mix and White woman,
at the behest of the local minister, an ethnic German.
This mixed couple will travel an hour and a half each way (twice a week)
to demonstrate to all the impressionable kids in this community what the
self-loathing German minister wants, for White people to end tens of thousands
of years of evolution by breeding with a non-White. He probably feels
bad about WW2, or is seeking revenge, haven't figured that out yet.
Whatever the case, this fact remains: if a White conservative family
has three kids and they send them off to this fundamentalist church, they'll
be ministered to by a race-mixed couple put forth by Whites as an appropriate
model of morality.
I have done the research. If parents want to avoid (in this 99%
White community) having race-mixing crammed down their kids throats, they
must minister to their own kids, or better yet, raise them agnostic.
Every church within 30 miles in either direction has either a race mixer
for a pastor (2), a Mexican for a pastor or a race-mixed church, such as
the holy rollers or Jehovah's Witnesses. Yes, even the quaker types
up here have Mexicans.
A Plea for Tolerance
In closing, I should say that forcing movement men and women into narrowly
defined roles or expecting racialists to believe in "conservative" ideals
is extremely naive and anti-Aryan by nature. I know anti-ZOG
liberals, animal rights activists, and many others who don't fit into that
"1950's except for tittie pictures" box, who are for our people.
Our people (and specifically pro-Whites) are fiercely independent, and
that independence has created geniuses the world may never see the likes
of again if our race perishes. Yes, if we perish. Let us correctly
and logically define the problems we face and cooperate with one another
to find a solution. Scapegoating each other or defining limiting,
stifling roles for intelligent and talented people will only force them
out of the movement, and then the dys-eugenics effect will start working
on us.
ANGRY WHITE FEMALE
