Welcoming Women as White Nationalists

I must warn you reading this right now -- it contains "progressive" material and constructive criticism of the current structure, strategies and composition of the pro-White movement. It is written from a semi-liberal (by liberal, I mean its former meaning of progressive and open-minded) racialist woman's point of view. I see women (and progressives) as the "missing link," and I will try to explain this in terms which will not offend our cherished men. The theme is that using retroactive antibiotics will not eradicate the resistant bug unleashed against our people.

 A word on retroactive traditionalism...

 Europeans have a sense of honor and fair play. Our famous battles involved two opposing groups of warriors gathering on one battlefield and duking it out until the stronger prevailed. The movement, I believe, has continued that tradition, hence has not adapted to the enemy's non-traditional alternative warfare strategies by utilizing all the weapons at its disposal.

 The enemy we face today is not fighting with traditional weapons, and his warfare is anything but honorable. The fight today is not against the Mongol Army. It is against those who have evolved the talent of using WORDS combined with PSYCHOLOGY to destroy their foes. In short, the weapons of war have changed -- but we have not. We have stuck to the traditionalist ideas and battle strategies of 1950s America, and that just won't cut it in the 21st century. I will attempt to demonstrate that our failure to adapt to changing conditions has kept the movement stagnant for decades. We have yet to scratch beneath the "skin" of the problem to uncover the bare bones. To do that, we must adapt to changing conditions and reexamine the elements of the struggle.

 Redefining women's roles...

 The movement speaks often of sex differences, but we have never really discussed, in depth, sex differences in terms of utilizing them beyond the return of nurturance and commitment to family first. The sex differences I want to utilize are the "other" psychological qualities that can and must be employed in the struggle. Many of those qualities are present in the enemy, but not in our men. They include a talent for "wordscrew," eliciting sympathy in the masses, the cunning of a cat, the ability to appeal to a wide audience and the tact to pull it off.

 The enemy has intelligently used his knowledge of psychology to turn White women into weapons of the anti-White crusaders, while the "right-wing" movement has been "Ghost dancing" to make it all go away. Past use of the Ghost Dance in America culminated in the slaughter of the Lakota Indians. The soil, White man, will not bury the enemy in the Springtime. Going back to "traditional roles" will not win this war because the soldiers, the battlefield and elements of the war have changed. Most notably, the war is being fought with words, and our traditional soldiers, men, have not been trained to fight this type of enemy. That is why the role of women must expand greatly in the movement if we are to move forward.

 White diversity as strength...

 Diversity is the enemy's term, but we have it right here in the movement and IT IS OUR GREATEST STRENGTH. Each difference (sex, class, ideological, religious, ethnic origin) is a STRENGTH. The movement sometimes views "difference" as a weakness and something undesireable. But the rules of the WAR have changed considerably as noted above. One cannot win a battle against tanks, automatic weapons, fighter planes and missiles (representing diversity) by chucking spears. Sticking to the old rules of war is a reactionary tactic, and one of defensiveness rather than progressiveness. A multi-faceted problem cannot be solved by single-faceted approach. We cannot win if our face is solely Christian, middle-class, middle-aged, male and patriotic. I am none of the above! I am a woman, Hail Odin, am not middle class, not middle-aged, and frankly I take delight when someone burns the flag. Hence, an obstacle facing us is the lack of "tolerance," and failure to utilize the greatest weapon at our disposal, diversity. I am not putting down the traditionalists, they have a great role in this battle, but thus far, they have been the sole grunts, and they have not been reinforced at the flank.

 Separation of church and race...

 Unlike the traditionalist Christian, an Odinist can appeal to an atheist, environmentalist or a "Skraeling-o-phile" because the Odinist feels more of a kinship with nature. He can see things the Christian may not. He has many non-traditional arguments. He has no problem being compared to nature because he does not believe he is separate and superior to it. He often uses nature correlations to explain our present situation. He is a "generalist," which means an animal that adapts to changing circumstances. The Christian may be a "specialist," which is an animal that does not adapt to changing conditions. In all probability, the Odinist is an evolutionist, while that line of reasoning goes against the fundamental principles of Christianity.

 If we were to choose an enemy, whom would we pick? I would pick one who never changes his arguments, strategies or politics. He is predictable and non-progressive. In other words, he is a non-moving target and an easy mark for the vultures who are circling above. The enemy knows this and uses it to his advantage. He becomes alarmed and hysterical when women begin gravitating toward their people, not because of sheer numbers, but because the mind of a woman is a necessary element for success. He gets very alarmed when non-Christians make their presence felt. This is why his attention has turned to Odinism. He becomes alarmed when he sees non-"right-wingers" descending on the movement, because they represent progressiveness. Diversity in the movement makes his job tougher because he cannot put us into an ideological pigeonhole.

 A progressive racialist can employ psychological mindscrew better than a conservative, by reframing the debate and redefining the issues. He can adapt their arguments to suit changing conditions. Example: A conservative will say "I oppose abortion because the Bible says life is sacred." A progressive will say "I oppose abortion for the same reason I oppose animal abuse, because it HURTS and the victim cannot articulate his pain." Another example: A conservative will say "I oppose immigration because the aliens aren't assimilating into Christian American culture." A progressive will say "I oppose immigration on environmental grounds and out of concern for working Americans." A conservative opposes bilingual education, while a progressive racialist gladly funds it because it maintains the separation necessary for our survival. A conservative will try to outlaw flag-burning. A progressive racialist will say "Screw the flag, burn it, it does not represent the interests of my people."

 Adapting to change...

 Whether we like it or not, conditions have changed, and our society has become feminized. The response of the movement (and some men in general) to this phenomenon has been to start "Ghost Dancing" in an attempt to bring back the woman of the 1940s. But as I stated earlier, women are a necessity in this battle because their minds are more akin to that of those who are trying to destroy us.  The enemy correctly predicted White men's response to feminism and used it to his advantage by being the first to co-opt us, thus creating the image of the angry white male as the enemy. He used his cunning to drive a wedge between White men and women. Some men have suggested we are the problem (rather than the solution). But how can a man find the key to re-open the hearts and minds of women when he doesn't understand our needs? The enemy made it a point to understand the hearts    and minds of      women and employed it as a battle tactic. He did not place a negative spin on the qualities of women. He saw a great weapon in women's intelligence, and used it to fight an enemy (White men) who hadn't ever faced this type of opponent before.

 It is the KEY we must find to open the door. Ramming it in will not win over the womenfolk. And winning over the womenfolk is a necessary task, not simply for reproductive reasons, but for those other things we do so cunningly well, not the least of which is determining the psychology of the enemy and using it against him.

 In closing, might I suggest that in every successful movement the energy and dynamism come from the unconventionals, the progressives? What revitalizes a movement is passion -- new ideas, philosophies and strategies. For lack of better terms, our problem has been intolerance of new ideas and diversity within our own movement. Dinos go extinct, and so will we if we don't stop believing the bullets will not pierce our bodies if we all just do the Ghost Dance.

ANGRY WHITE FEMALE